Skip to main content

Forrest v. State

Citations

  • 721 A.2d 1271
  • 1999 Del. LEXIS 8
  • 1999 WL 9768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “[a]ppellate court follows [an] abuse of discretion standard when reviewing [a] trial court’s decision on admissibility of evidence”
  • noting there is “no distinction between circumstantial and direct evidence when considering the quantum necessary to support a conviction” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walsh, Holland, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.