Skip to main content

Kiser v. State

Citations

  • 769 A.2d 736
  • 2001 Del. LEXIS 153
  • 2001 WL 361746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding witness testimony, because that testimony would have been relevant to the defendant’s claim of misidentification, and because the testimony was not prohibited under D.R.E. 403
  • “Rule 403 requires the probative value of relevant evidence to be ‘substantially outweighed’ by the danger of confusing the issues or misleading the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Berger, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.