Supreme Court of Delaware· 4/9/2001
Kiser v. State
Citations
- 769 A.2d 736
- 2001 Del. LEXIS 153
- 2001 WL 361746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding witness testimony, because that testimony would have been relevant to the defendant’s claim of misidentification, and because the testimony was not prohibited under D.R.E. 403
- “Rule 403 requires the probative value of relevant evidence to be ‘substantially outweighed’ by the danger of confusing the issues or misleading the jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Berger, Steele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. GuestSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-03-14· cited 35×
- Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-05-21· cited 24×
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-04-14· cited 18×
- Gallaway v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2013-05-02· cited 11×
- Norwood v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-06-24· cited 9×
- Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-06-28· cited 7×
- Hansley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-10-27· cited 6×
- State v. MundenSuperior Court of Delaware· 2005-08-25· cited 2×
- Hansley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-11-05
- Finney v. Delaware Department of TransportationSuperior Court of Delaware· 2021-02-01
- Express Scripts, Inc. v. Bracket Holdings CorpSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-02-23
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-11-28· cited 72×
- Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-05-18· cited 57×
- Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-01-16· cited 44×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-10-20· cited 44×
- Mercedes-Benz of North America Inc. v. Norman Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-08-06· cited 36×
- State v. KaiamaHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-02-23· cited 31×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-12-04· cited 19×
- State v. BolducSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-03-11· cited 11×
- Farmer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1997-08-21· cited 9×
- People v. DiazNew York Supreme Court· 1981-11-23· cited 8×
- People v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-01-25· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.