Skip to main content

Burke v. State

Citations

  • 484 A.2d 490
  • 1984 Del. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • absent showing of actual prejudice, refusal of trial judge to sequester jury prior to deliberations not abuse of discretion
  • also holding that the written or recorded statement itself need not be introduced for D.R.E. 106 to apply; a party may seek to use the rule to supplement oral testimony about a written or recorded statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herrmann, McNEILLY, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.