Skip to main content

Hardin v. State

Citations

  • 844 A.2d 982
  • 2004 Del. LEXIS 123
  • 2004 WL 527930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • drugs found on defendant’s person and in a car admissible under inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule
  • such additional evidence may be in the form of detective's expert testimony that, based on his experience, the quantity of drugs found in defendant's possession and the packaging material evidenced that the drugs were intended for sale
  • applying the inevitable discovery rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.