Supreme Court of Delaware· 7/31/1991

Robertson v. State

Citations

596 A.2d 1345
1991 Del. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, if not made at trial, objections to the State's rebuttal argument are deemed waived unless “substantial rights are jeopardized and the fairness of the trial imperiled”
holding that “the quantum of evidence necessary for reasonable suspicion is less than that required for probable cause”
Quantum of evidence necessary for reasonable suspicion is less than that required for probable cause
“Although we give due deference to an officer’s experience and knowledge, the facts which form the basis of the reasonable suspicion must be capable of measurement against an objective standard.”
“Although we give due deference to an officer’s experience and knowledge, the facts which form the basis of the reasonable suspicion must be capable of measurement against an objective standard.”
repeated, extensive references to defendant’s failure to testify constituted plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie, Horsey, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.