Wiley v. Glassman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff suffered adverse employment action as a result of her exclusion from the managing editor rotation, which would have allowed her to gain the requisite supervisory experience for future promotions
• determining that a materially adverse action is one that would “dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination”
• determining that a materially adverse action is one that would “dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination”
• finding that plaintiff failed to prove that her duties and responsibilities had increased so as to warrant an accretion of duties promotion, in part because she failed to accept defendant’s offer to conduct a desk audit of her position
• noting that a prima facie discrimination claim requires that the plaintiff be (1) “a member of a protected class;” (2) have “suffered an adverse employment action;” and (3) that “the unfavorable action gives rise to an inference of discrimination.”
• finding plaintiff did not suffer adverse employment action where plaintiff “offered nothing” to establish that a reduction in airtime as a broadcaster could affect her compensation, grade, or opportunity for future advancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).