District of Columbia· 5/11/2010

Winston v. Clough

Citations

712 F. Supp. 2d 1
2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45878
93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,892
2010 WL 1875626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that plaintiff faces a “low hurdle” at the motion to dismiss stage
finding an adequate claim under Title VII where the plaintiff alleges that “that other co-workers outside of [his] protected class used their cell phones more than he did, 6 yet none was suspended or disciplined for it”
“A plaintiff alleging retaliation faces a low hurdle at the motion to dismiss stage, and need not present evidence of pretext.”
Plaintiff stated a claim for discrimination by alleging “other co-workers outside of [Plaintiff’s] protected class used their cell phones more than [he] did, yet none was suspended or disciplined[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Winston v. Clough

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Winston v. Clough
District of Columbia· 2013-05-17· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.