Skip to main content
· 8/18/2015

Edna Doak v. Jeh Johnson

Citations

  • 418 U.S. App. D.C. 375
  • 798 F.3d 1096
  • 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1633
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14452
  • 2015 WL 4910067

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an agency can waive the deadline for contacting an EEO counselor if it accepts, investigates, and decides a claim on the merits
  • employer entitled to summary judgment where “it was essential to [the plaintiff]’s job that []he be present for interactive meetings during normal business hours and that the accommodations []he requested would not have enabled h[im] to perform that function[]”
  • tracing Rehabilitation Act’s initial charge-filing rule to statute
  • citing, e.g., 29 U.S.C. § 794a(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Millett, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.