Skip to main content
· 3/22/1996

Herbert K. Wilson v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary, Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 79 F.3d 154
  • 316 U.S. App. D.C. 352
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 5129
  • 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,005
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that employee was entitled to sue in district court to challenge the Coast Guard’s calculation of his back-pay award where EEOC did not act on his petition for enforcement within 180 days
  • concluding that a Title VII claimant was entitled to file suit to challenge the correctness of an agency’s computation of a backpay award once the EEOC failed to act on the claimant’s petition for enforcement within 180 days
  • explaining that plaintiff exhausted administrative appeal where EEOC “did not request any information from him” during its investigation
  • explaining that extending a limitations period “d[id] not alter the legal effect of any pre-amendment event, nor d[id] it change the remedies available for pre-amendment violations”
  • explaining that notice requires “both the right to sue and the time limit”
  • observing that “[i]f a complainant forces an agency to dismiss or cancel the complaint by failing to provide sufficient information to enable the agency to investigate the claim, he may not file a judicial suit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Wald, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.