Forkkio, Samuel E. v. Powell, Donald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an employee suffers an adverse employment action if he experiences materially adverse consequences affecting the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” such as pay, benefits, or substantive responsibilities
• holding that assignment to work under supervisor whom plaintiff considered offensive was not an adverse action supporting a retaliation claim because plaintiff had not alleged that the assignment caused any objective harm
• holding that a party was not entitled to Rule 56(d
• stating that adverse employment action must entail objective harm, and purely subjective harms, such as dissatisfaction or humiliation, are not adverse
• finding that an employee did not experience an adverse employment action when the employee did not receive management-related emails or other communications
• noting that an objectively tangible harm is present when a reasonable trier of fact could find that the plaintiff “experience[d] materially adverse consequences affecting the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or future employment opportunities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).