California Court of Appeal· 8/17/2004
Wilbanks v. Wolk
Citations
- 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 497
- 121 Cal. App. 4th 883
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 10172
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7575
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statements warning consumers not to use plaintiffs' brokerage services were directly connected to an issue of public concern
- concluding that statements warning consumers not to use plaintiffs' brokerage services were directly connected to an issue of public concern
- explaining that statements issued as a warning not to use a professional's services directly connected to an issue of public concern where the information provided was in the nature of consumer protection information
- statements regarding incompetence of a brokerage concerned a public issue because the statements were a warning not to use the brokerage’s services
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2019-07-22· cited 356×
- Filmon.Com. Inc. v. Doubleverify Inc.California Supreme Court· 2019-05-06· cited 206×
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-11-09· cited 192×
- NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-02-01· cited 170×
- Huntingdon Life Sciences, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-06-01· cited 149×
- Barrett v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-11-20· cited 136×
- Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LlcNinth Circuit· 2013-04-17· cited 133×
- Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-30· cited 129×
- Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher OrganizationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-02-09· cited 122×
- Cross v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-07-11· cited 106×
- Jackson v. MayweatherCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-03-27· cited 102×
- Hall v. Time Warner, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2007-08-02· cited 92×
- Terry v. DAVIS COMMUNITY CHURCHCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-08-18· cited 90×
- Grewal v. JammuCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-01-11· cited 81×
- Cole v. Patricia a. Meyer & Associates, APCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-06-08· cited 79×
- Carver v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-12-29· cited 77×
- Summit Bank v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-05-29· cited 74×
- Ruiz v. Harbor View Community Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-12-19· cited 71×
- Graffiti Protective Coatings, Inc. v. City of Pico RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-02-05· cited 66×
- Tichinin v. City of Morgan HillCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-09-21· cited 63×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,770×
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,180×
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 1,129×
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 935×
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 719×
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-01-21· cited 692×
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-08-18· cited 532×
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-11-15· cited 348×
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court· 1989-04-27· cited 341×
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-08-16· cited 304×
- Church of Scientology v. WollersheimCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-02-01· cited 209×
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanNinth Circuit· 1995-05-30· cited 194×
- Damon v. Ocean Hills Journalism ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-12-13· cited 164×
- Weinberg v. FeiselCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-07-25· cited 158×
- Rivero v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIOCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-01-28· cited 133×
- Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal· 2000-05-23· cited 131×
- Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal· 1995-08-09· cited 130×
- Seelig v. Infinity Broadcasting Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2002-04-16· cited 109×
- DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-02-14· cited 105×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.