Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 17200 applicable because 2 claims “do not arise from any stock transactions between the parties” but “from the 3 allegedly defamatory reports published . . . .” (emphasis in original)
• finding allegations of “diminution of value of.. .assets and decline in market capitalization and other vested interests” to satisfy the UCL injury in fact requirement
• a plaintiff who alleged that a defendant’s defamatory statements diminished its assets and reduced its market capitalization adequately alleged UCL standing
• “[D]imunition in value of [a plaintiff’s] assets and decline in its market capitalization and 10 other vested interest” is sufficient to meet the UCL injury requirement.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).