Weinberg v. Feisel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under the anti-SLAPP statute, “the focus of the speaker’s conduct should be the public interest rather than a mere effort to gather ammunition for another round of private controversy”
• statements by one token collector accusing another token collector of theft which were published in letters to more than twenty collectors concerned \a private dispute between private parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).