Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The anti-SLAPP statute is not ambiguous with respect to whether its protection of ‘any act’ furthering protected rights encompasses suing for malicious prosecution.”
• “[Ejvery Court of Appeal that has addressed the question has concluded that malicious prosecution causes of action fall within the purview of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
• “[E]very [California] Court of Appeal that has addressed the question has concluded that malicious prosecution causes of action fall within the purview of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
• “[E]very [California] Court of Appeal that has addressed the question has concluded that malicious prosecution causes of action fall within the purview of the anti-SLAPP statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).