Skip to main content
· 12/13/2000

Damon v. Ocean Hills Journalism Club

Citations

  • 102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 205
  • 85 Cal. App. 4th 468
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 13185
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9925
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because publications in local, community newsletter criticizing manager were part of ongoing debate over the management of the homeowner's association, the information affected a significant number of people
  • holding that discussions about HOA matters addressed matters of public concern, in part because “they concerned ‘issues of critical importance to a large segment of our local population’”
  • holding that a \public forum\ is a place that is open to the public or where information is freely exchanged, regardless of whether it is uninhibited or controlled
  • holding that a \public forum\ is defmed as a place that is open to the public or where information is freely exchanged, regardless of whether it is uninhibited or controlled
  • holding that a \public forum\ is defined as a place that is open to the public or where information is freely exchanged, regardless of whether it is uninhibited or controlled
  • holding that a \public forum\ is defined as a place that is open to the public or where information is freely exchanged, regardless of whether it is uninhibited or controlled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.