Skip to main content
· 4/27/1989

Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.

Citations

  • 771 P.2d 406
  • 48 Cal. 3d 711
  • 257 Cal. Rptr. 708
  • 16 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1625
  • 1989 Cal. LEXIS 1527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to apply statutory version of the privilege to press publications
  • distinguishing between 23 compensatory damages, presumed damages, and punitive damages in libel actions
  • “[W]hen the Legislature has carefully employed a term in one place and has excluded it in another, it should not be implied where excluded.”
  • “We see no reason to deny California citizens protection for their reputations equal to that provided in other states. We decline to diverge from the near unanimous authority that a private person need prove only negligence (rather than malice) to recover for defamation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagleson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.