ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “failed to establish probability of success under California’s anti-SLAPP statute on abuse of process claim because plaintiff alleged misuse of administrative process of Federal Communications Commission rather than abuse of judicial process”
• explaining that the party seeking fees bears the burden “of establishing entitlement 17 to an award and documenting the appropriate hours expended and hourly rates”
• explaining that abuse of process only arises when there is actual \use of the machinery of the legal system for an ulterior motive\ (internal quotations omitted)
• explaining that abuse of process only arises when there is actual \use of the machinery of the legal system for an ulterior motive\ (internal quotations omitted)
• explaining that abuse of process only arises when there is actual \use of the machinery of the legal system for an ulterior motive\ (internal quotations omitted)
• explaining that abuse of process only arises when there is actual \use of the machinery of the legal system for an ulterior motive\ SUPREME COURT (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).