NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-Kerttula

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that websites accessible to the public are 15 “public forums” for purposes of the California anti-SLAPP statute
• “any information” construed in light of the kinds of protected information enumerated in the next sentence
• “Under well-established principles of statutory construction, we must accord[] significance, if possible, to every word, phrase and sentence in pursuance of the legislative purpose, [citations], avoiding an interpretation that renders a part of the statute ... surplusage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).