Huntingdon Life Sciences, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Mere allegations that defendants acted illegally, however, do not render the 11 anti-SLAPP statute inapplicable.”
• business entity unable to pursue intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy claims
• a cause of action under CCP § 527.6 only applies to natural persons
• plaintiffs home and car were vandalized by animal rights protestors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).