Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/21/1987
Wicker v. State
Citations
- 740 S.W.2d 779
- 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 671
- 1987 WL 1000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abatement for findings was appropriate in a case in which the appellant raised issues of both pure voluntariness and the failure to give Miranda warnings
- “ Miranda has since been extended to cover custodial interrogation of one suspected of even a misdemeanor traffic offense.”
- A Miranda has since been extended to cover custodial interrogation of one suspected of even a misdemeanor traffic offense. @
- \the term 'custodial interrogation' [in Article 38.22] was intended by the legislature to be construed consistently with its meaning under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.\
- “The proper procedure is that the appeal will be abated and the trial judge will be directed to reduce to writing his findings on the disputed issues surrounding the taking of appellant’s confession.”
- “The proper procedure is that the appeal will be abated and the trial judge will be directed to reduce to writing his findings on the disputed issues surrounding the taking of appellant’s confession.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
184 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 1,256×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-10-21· cited 640×
- Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-21· cited 463×
- Hai Hai Vuong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 352×
- Meek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-23· cited 239×
- Gregory v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-09-13· cited 185×
- Urias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-02-16· cited 176×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-29· cited 118×
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-10-23· cited 112×
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-07-06· cited 88×
- Drake v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-11-13· cited 77×
- Stahle v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1998-05-18· cited 73×
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-17· cited 65×
- Gomes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-01-13· cited 56×
- Cates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-07· cited 48×
- Rushing v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-08-01· cited 43×
- State v. SprouseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 28×
- Cerda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-01-06· cited 28×
- Ramos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1991-12-19· cited 28×
- State v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-05-27· cited 28×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-05-06· cited 760×
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court· 1969-03-25· cited 661×
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 561×
- Shiflet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-09· cited 264×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-10-26· cited 216×
- Paez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-12-05· cited 78×
- Ruth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-16· cited 77×
- Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-19· cited 64×
- Ancira v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-12-18· cited 57×
- Hester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-04-14· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.