Supreme Court· 7/6/1983
California v. Beheler
Citations
- 463 U.S. 1121
- 103 S. Ct. 3517
- 77 L. Ed. 2d 1275
- 1983 U.S. LEXIS 114
- 51 U.S.L.W. 3934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that suspect's voluntary appearance and departure at police station for questioning was not custodial interrogation
- holding that suspect’s voluntary appearance and departure at police station for questioning was not custodial interrogation
- holding that defendant was not “in custody” for purposes of Miranda even though the police questioned him in the station house and considered him the main suspect
- holding that whether an individual has been arrested, in the constitutional sense, is an objective, legal deter mination based on the circumstances ol his restrain t
- holding that appellant was not in custody where police gave him a ride to police station for interview and had incriminating evidence against him
- holding that interrogation at police station was non-custodial, and Miranda was therefore inapplicable, where suspect voluntarily accompanied police officers to the station
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Brennan, Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1,281 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 4,010×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-06-26· cited 1,429×
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court· 2012-02-21· cited 785×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-10-21· cited 640×
- State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 600×
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-16· cited 582×
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 563×
- Cortez v. McCauleyTenth Circuit· 2007-02-19· cited 554×
- Freddie Sevier v. Kenneth TurnerSixth Circuit· 1984-09-20· cited 548×
- State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 479×
- Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-21· cited 463×
- State v. BirosOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 432×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-07-27· cited 363×
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 254×
- People v. SamCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-05-28· cited 165×
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 157×
- People v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-01-30· cited 140×
- People v. McClaryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-12-02· cited 127×
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-04-09· cited 95×
- People v. HerdanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-10-03· cited 45×
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-11-27· cited 43×
- People v. BlouinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-04-24· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.