Meek v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no custody when suspect voluntarily attended interview, was free to leave, had unsupervised access to his car, and was allowed to leave “a few hours” later
• finding that fact that appellant came to authorities of his own free will and was allowed to leave unhindered outweighed fact that he was focus of criminal investigation
• finding that 5 fact that appellant came to authorities of his own free will and was allowed to leave unhindered outweighed fact that he was focus of criminal investigation
• finding no custody in part because Meek was allowed to step outside building and go unaccompanied to his car during interviews
• finding no custody in part because Meek was allowed to step outside building and go unaccompanied to his car during interviews
• finding no custody in part because Meek was allowed to step outside building and go unaccompanied to his car during interviews

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).