Skip to main content

Bass v. State

Citations

  • 723 S.W.2d 687
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the legislature intended the term A custodial interrogation @ in Article 38.22 to be construed consistently with its meaning under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
  • construing “custodial interrogation” under article 38.22 as consistent with meaning of “custodial interrogation” under Fifth Amendment
  • “custodial interrogation” as used in Article 38.22 was intended to be construed consistently with its meaning under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
  • “custodial interrogation” as used in Article 38.22 was intended to be construed consistently with its meaning under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
  • “custodial interrogation” as used in Article 38.22 was intended to be construed consistently with its meaning under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution
  • court’s construction of “custodial interrogation” for purposes of article 38.22 was consistent with meaning of “custodial interrogation” under Fifth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Teague, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.