Paez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state employee does not become an agent of law enforcement within the context of Miranda unless there exists a police practice of using non-law enforcement personnel to accomplish what the police could not have lawfully accomplished themselves
• holding article 38.22 does not apply to non-law enforcement personnel who are not government agents
• stating that the defendant bears the initial burden of proving \custody\
• Article 38.22 does not apply to non-law enforcement personnel who are not state agents
• mere filing of motion to suppress does not “thrust a burden on the State to show compliance with Miranda or article 38.22 warnings”
• mere filing of motion to suppress does not \thrust a burden on the State to show compliance with Miranda or article 38.22 warnings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).