Skip to main content

Vasquez v. State

Citations

  • 411 S.W.3d 918
  • 2013 WL 5729828
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “written findings are required in all cases concerning voluntariness,” and “[t]he statute has no exceptions”
  • holding that a court of appeals errs by not abating for the requisite findings
  • holding that, when the issue is voluntariness of a confession, a trial court must file findings of fact and conclusions of law “whether or not the defendant objects to the absence of such omitted filing”
  • holding that, when the issue is voluntariness of a confession, a trial court must file findings of fact and conclusions of law “whether or not the defendant objects to the absence of such omitted filing”
  • holding that, when the issue is voluntariness of a confession, a trial court must file findings of fact and conclusions of law “whether or not the defendant objects to the absence of such omitted filing”
  • holding that, when the issue is voluntariness of a confession, a trial court must file findings of fact and conclusions of law “whether or not the defendant objects to the absence of such omitted filing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.