Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/4/2021
Weller v. Weller
Syllabus
In this domestic matter, Bradley Weller (Husband) appeals the family court's order denying his request to terminate or modify alimony. Husband argues the court erred in (1) finding he did not show a substantial change in circumstances justifying termination or modification of alimony, (2) relying on inadmissible and irrelevant facts in making its determination, and (3) awarding Gail Weller (Wife) attorney's fees.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
- Stoney v. SRSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-12-20· cited 175×
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-10-29· cited 90×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-10-31· cited 52×
- Miles v. MilesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-31· cited 44×
- Doe v. RoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-05· cited 37×
- Butler v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-08-19· cited 33×
- Miles v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-08-22· cited 30×
- Gartside v. GartsideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-04-29· cited 29×
- Holmes v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-08-15· cited 18×
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-06-06· cited 10×
- Posner v. PosnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-04-16· cited 10×
- Pendergast v. PendergastCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 6×
- Sweeney v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-04-05· cited 6×
- Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-03-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.