Gartside v. Gartside

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it proper to impute income to husband based on current employment at lower salary as opposed to former higher-paying job when husband lost former job through no fault of his own
• affirming the imputation of minimum wage income to a wife who had been out of the workforce for twenty years but was capable and energetic, based on the wife's ability to earn more than her reported income, taking into account work history and job opportunities
• \An award of attorneys' fees rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.\
• \[A] party cannot use a Rule 59(e) motion to present to the family court an issue the party could have raised prior to judgment but did not.\
• \[A] party cannot use a Rule 59(e) motion to present to the family court an issue the party could have raised prior to judgment but did not.\
• a party cannot use a motion to reconsider, alter or amend a judgment to present an issue that could have been raised prior to the judgment but was not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).