Skip to main content

Sweeney v. Sweeney

Citations

  • 420 S.C. 69
  • 800 S.E.2d 148
  • 2017 WL 1293987
  • 2017 S.C. App. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the family court's finding of contempt because the husband willfully violated a temporary order despite his argument that he did it without a \bad purpose\
  • finding because the husband did not raise an argument in his Rule 59(e) motion-thereby not allowing the family court the opportunity to rule upon the issue or correct any alleged mistakes in its final order-the issue was not preserved on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huff, Short, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.