Pendergast v. Pendergast

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining when a mother's standard of living and income has remained unchanged and the father's income and ability to pay have substantially increased, a substantial change in circumstances does not exist justifying modification of alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Serowski v. Serowski
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 10×
• Weller v. Weller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-08-04

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Glasscock v. Glasscock
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
• E.D.M. v. T.A.M.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
• Stevenson v. Stevenson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-22· cited 116×
• Cherry v. Thomasson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-09· cited 113×
• Smith v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-06-19· cited 59×
• Skinner v. King
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-03-05· cited 53×
• Thornton v. Thornton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-13· cited 42×
• Brunner v. Brunner
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-27· cited 14×
• Hardwick v. Hardwick
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-12-10· cited 10×
• Van Dyck v. Van Dyck
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-06-01· cited 4×
• Graffeo v. Graffeo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1958-12-15· cited 2×

Other cases named Pendergast v. Pendergast

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Pendergast v. Pendergast
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2008-02-20
• Pendergast v. Pendergast
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-25