Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/29/1988

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

372 S.E.2d 107
296 S.C. 289
1988 S.C. App. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, on appeal, this court looks to the overall fairness of the apportionment
providing that using the property exclusively for marital purposes is evidence that the parties regard the property as common property
providing that using marital funds to build equity in the property is evidence the parties regard the property as common property
holding the purpose of alimony is to place the supported spouse, as nearly as practical, in the position of support she enjoyed during the marriage
holding “the mere use of separate property to support the marriage, without some additional evidence of intent to treat it as property of the marriage, is not sufficient to establish transmutation”
holding nonmarital property may be transmuted into marital property if: (1) it becomes so commingled with marital property as to be untraceable; (2) it is jointly titled; or (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Sanders, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.