Skip to main content

Citations

  • 631 S.E.2d 317
  • 369 S.C. 351
  • 2006 S.C. App. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the family court to be preserved for appellate review
  • providing that an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the family court to be preserved for appellate review
  • noting that the best interest of the child is the ultimate consideration
  • noting that the best interest of the child is the ultimate consideration
  • stating an issue must be both raised to and ruled upon by the family court in order to be preserved for appellate review
  • \An issue is not preserved where the trial court does not explicitly rule on an argument and the appellant does not make a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hearn, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.