Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/20/2019
Sweeney v. Sweeney
Citations
- 826 S.E.2d 299
- 426 S.C. 229
Syllabus
In this marital litigation, we clarify that in determining alimony, family courts should consider the effect of investment income on both parties.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the subsection 20-3-130(C)(6) factor, current and reasonably anticipated earnings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
- Brewer v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1993-08-11· cited 62×
- Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-01-05· cited 27×
- In Re the Marriage of ArmstrongColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-04-23· cited 27×
- Sweeney v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-04-05· cited 6×
- Worsnop v. WorsnopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-05-23· cited 3×
- Blackmon v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.