Skip to main content

Sweeney v. Sweeney

Citations

  • 826 S.E.2d 299
  • 426 S.C. 229

Syllabus

In this marital litigation, we clarify that in determining alimony, family courts should consider the effect of investment income on both parties.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the subsection 20-3-130(C)(6) factor, current and reasonably anticipated earnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hearn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.