Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/15/2012

Holmes v. Holmes

Citations

399 S.C. 499
732 S.E.2d 213
2012 S.C. App. LEXIS 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing the family court's decision to treat bonus income differently, ordering a percentage of future bonuses in alimony
affirming the family court's order requiring Husband to pay Wife alimony but reducing Husband's monthly alimony payments upon finding Husband demonstrated an unanticipated, substantial change in circumstances
\[T]he same considerations relevant to the initial setting of an alimony award may be applied in the modification context.\ (quoting Miles, 355 S.C. at 519, 586 S.E.2d at 140)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockemy, Thomas, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.