Miles v. Miles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the considerations relevant for the initial determination of alimony also relevant in the modification context
• stating the family court, which saw and heard the witnesses, was in a better position to evaluate their credibility and assign comparative weight to their testimony
• “It is axiomatic that parties cannot modify a court order.”
• \It is axiomatic that parties cannot modify a court order.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miles v. Miles
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-31· cited 44×
• Butler v. Butler
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-08-19· cited 33×
• Gartside v. Gartside
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-04-29· cited 29×
• Messer v. Messer
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-14· cited 23×
• Rimer v. Rimer
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-11-08· cited 20×
• Holmes v. Holmes
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-08-15· cited 18×
• Fiddie v. Fiddie
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-16· cited 12×
• Noojin v. Noojin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-06· cited 8×
• Fuller v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-01-25· cited 4×
• Kelley v. Kelley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-04-24· cited 3×
• Weller v. Weller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-08-04

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• E.D.M. v. T.A.M.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
• Stevenson v. Stevenson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-22· cited 116×
• Cherry v. Thomasson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-09· cited 113×
• Stevenson v. Stevenson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 59×
• Kelley v. Kelley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-21· cited 56×
• Heins v. Heins
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 47×
• Thornton v. Thornton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-13· cited 42×
• Ebert v. Ebert
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-06· cited 31×
• Bryson v. Bryson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-10-01· cited 15×
• Croom v. Croom
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-06-10· cited 14×
• Vance v. Vance
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-02-07· cited 12×
• Sanchez v. Tilley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-05-14· cited 7×