District of Columbia· 9/7/2000
Weigert v. Georgetown University
Citations
- 120 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18873
- 2000 WL 1644140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the ADA incorporates the procedures of Title VII, rulings in this area applying to adverse actions are relevant [to evaluating adverse actions under the ADA].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict of Columbia· 2003-09-29· cited 393×
- Lester v. NatsiosDistrict of Columbia· 2003-10-07· cited 225×
- Melanie Williams v. Motorola, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2002-08-29· cited 77×
- Scarborough v. NatsiosDistrict of Columbia· 2002-03-20· cited 58×
- Thompson v. RiceDistrict of Columbia· 2006-03-13· cited 42×
- Baker v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2003-12-02· cited 39×
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-21· cited 34×
- Singleton v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2005-07-22· cited 34×
- Blackwell v. Sectek, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-08-05· cited 31×
- Williams v. Eastside Lumberyard and Supply Co.S.D. Illinois· 2001-03-23· cited 19×
- Franklin v. Pepco Holdings, Inc.District of Columbia· 2012-07-13· cited 18×
- Bowden v. CloughDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-29· cited 16×
- Porter v. FulghamDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-09· cited 13×
- Bryant v. LeavittDistrict of Columbia· 2007-02-22· cited 13×
- Brown v. PaulsonDistrict of Columbia· 2008-04-01· cited 8×
- Bugg-Barber v. Randstad US, L.P.District of Columbia· 2003-05-20· cited 8×
- Schmidt v. SolisDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-18· cited 8×
- Gurara v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-08· cited 7×
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2003-06-25· cited 6×
- Lee v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-20· cited 6×
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 3,836×
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementSecond Circuit· 1994-04-27· cited 2,455×
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyFirst Circuit· 1991-12-16· cited 1,952×
- Wright v. WestSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 1,604×
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,381×
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterD.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.D.C. Circuit· 1999-12-21· cited 670×
- Vivian J. Smart v. Ball State UniversitySeventh Circuit· 1996-07-15· cited 480×
- Little v. United TechnologiesEleventh Circuit· 1997-01-22· cited 404×
- Wellington Mitchell v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of CommerceD.C. Circuit· 1985-04-05· cited 377×
- Dutcher v. Ingalls ShipbuildingFifth Circuit· 1995-06-05· cited 296×
- Jay Lawrence Halperin v. Abacus Technology CorporationFourth Circuit· 1997-09-18· cited 279×
- Soileau v. Guilford of Maine, Inc.First Circuit· 1997-01-23· cited 277×
- Silk v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1999-10-08· cited 255×
Other cases named Weigert v. Georgetown University
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.