Skip to main content
· 7/15/1996

Vivian J. Smart v. Ball State University

Citations

  • 89 F.3d 437
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17432
  • 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,212
  • 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 495
  • 1996 WL 392234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that negative employer evaluations, even if undeserved, were not alone sufficient to show an adverse employment action
  • recognizing that “adverse employment action” is defined quite broadly and can be premised on terms and conditions of employment apart from hours, pay, or benefits
  • holding that a negative performance evaluation was not an adverse employment action where employer did not take any other action against the employee
  • holding that negative performance evaluations alone cannot constitute an adverse employment action
  • holding that negative performance evaluations alone cannot constitute an adverse employment action
  • holding that a negative criticism or performance evaluation, unaccompanied by a materially adverse change in the terms or conditions of employment, does not constitute adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.