· 7/15/1996
Vivian J. Smart v. Ball State University
Citations
- 89 F.3d 437
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17432
- 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,212
- 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 495
- 1996 WL 392234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that negative employer evaluations, even if undeserved, were not alone sufficient to show an adverse employment action
- recognizing that “adverse employment action” is defined quite broadly and can be premised on terms and conditions of employment apart from hours, pay, or benefits
- holding that a negative performance evaluation was not an adverse employment action where employer did not take any other action against the employee
- holding that negative performance evaluations alone cannot constitute an adverse employment action
- holding that negative performance evaluations alone cannot constitute an adverse employment action
- holding that a negative criticism or performance evaluation, unaccompanied by a materially adverse change in the terms or conditions of employment, does not constitute adverse employment action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Kanne, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.