Schmidt v. Solis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[i]t is clear that requesting a reasonable accommodation for a disability is a protected activity under the [Americans with Disabilities Act]”
• noting that, under the Rehabilitation Act, “substantive rights are defined by reference to the ADA, as well as the [EEOC’s] regulations and enforcement guidance that implement the ADA”
• “It is clear that requesting a reasonable accommodation for a disability is a protected activity under the [Americans with Disabilities Act].”
• “[I]t is not appropriate to require proof of intent when the claim is that the employer failed to provide a reasonable accommodation.” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• applying ADA EEOC interpretive guidance in Rehabilitation Act cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2015-09-28· cited 60×
• Von Drasek v. Burwell
  District of Columbia· 2015-08-17· cited 32×
• Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  District of Columbia· 2016-03-31· cited 28×
• Ellison v. Napolitano
  District of Columbia· 2012-11-04· cited 18×
• Morris v. Johnson
  District of Columbia· 2013-10-30· cited 17×
• Ali v. Pruitt
  District of Columbia· 2020-10-19
• Shealayno'sun v. Esper
  District of Columbia· 2021-01-05
• Hester v. Paul Public Charter School
  District of Columbia· 2022-01-04

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 3,317×
• Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital Center
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
• Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School District
  Third Circuit· 1999-08-18· cited 836×
• Donald Barth v. Bruce S. Gelb, Director, United States Information Agency
  D.C. Circuit· 1993-08-27· cited 238×
• Smith v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-12-06· cited 207×
• Rosemarie CARR, Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General
  D.C. Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 201×
• Mogenhan v. Napolitano
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-07-27· cited 144×
• Mayers v. Laborers' Health & Safety Fund of North America
  D.C. Circuit· 2007-03-02· cited 118×
• Eugene B. Kassman v. The American University. Appeal of Lloyd Ultan
  D.C. Circuit· 1976-11-19· cited 92×
• Glenn Cassimy v. Board of Education of the Rockford Public Schools, District 205
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-09-05· cited 68×
• Scarborough v. Natsios
  District of Columbia· 2002-03-20· cited 58×
• Constance Snowden v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., and James L. Ivey
  D.C. Circuit· 1972-01-20· cited 56×
• Mason v. Geithner
  District of Columbia· 2011-09-12· cited 55×
• Weigert v. Georgetown University
  District of Columbia· 2000-09-07· cited 46×
• Medina v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2011-07-01· cited 36×
• Graffius v. Shinseki
  District of Columbia· 2009-12-11· cited 34×
• Chinchillo v. Powell
  District of Columbia· 2003-01-07· cited 34×
• Zeigler v. Potter
  District of Columbia· 2009-08-13· cited 8×