Thompson v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim based on plaintiffs brain hemorrhage because it was no longer an impairment by the time the challenged employment actions took place
• plaintiffs claim fails because she has not shown she is excluded from substantial class or broad range of jobs
• “Merely submitting a medical diagnosis of an impairment is insufficient to establish disability status.”
• “[T]he employee must supply 49 ‘enough information that, under the circumstances, the employer can be fairly said to know of both the disability and desire for an accommodation.’” (quoting Taylor v. Phoenixville Sch. Dist., 184 F.3d 296, 313 (3d Cir. 1999)) (emphasis supplied)
• similarly assuming so without deciding the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).