District of Columbia· 8/5/2014
Blackwell v. Sectek, Inc.
Citations
- 61 F. Supp. 3d 149
- 2014 WL 3834984
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107014
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing a claim to proceed past a motion to dismiss that was “at least plausible”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge John D. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-28· cited 60×
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-13· cited 57×
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-27· cited 36×
- Vick v. DonahoeDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-28· cited 24×
- Cooper v. HendersonDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-31· cited 21×
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-30· cited 13×
- Epps v. Potomac Elec. Power Co.D.C. Circuit· 2019-06-10· cited 9×
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteDistrict of Columbia· 2018-03-30
- Epps v. Potomac Electric Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2019-06-10
- Stephenson v. ChaoDistrict of Columbia· 2020-01-10
- Vick v. DonahoeDistrict of Columbia· 2020-04-06
- Shah v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict of Columbia· 2020-10-29
- Khadem v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict of Columbia· 2020-10-29
- Pappas v. Metropolitan Police Department of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2021-01-12
- Woodson v. SmithDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-14
- Best v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-17
- Liu v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2022-07-06
- Lynn v. Altarum InstituteDistrict of Columbia· 2023-06-26
- Montgomery v. McDonoughDistrict of Columbia· 2023-06-29
- Pressley v. Management Support Technology, Inc.District of Columbia· 2023-08-14
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 4,775×
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 2,790×
- Baloch v. KempthorneD.C. Circuit· 2008-12-30· cited 1,027×
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorD.C. Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 985×
- Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Ricki Helfer, Chairman, FdicD.C. Circuit· 1997-12-23· cited 376×
- Douglas v. DonovanD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-17· cited 361×
- Richard A. Sullivan v. River Valley School District, and Charles O. Williams, Superintendent, Individually and in His Official CapacitySixth Circuit· 1999-11-29· cited 247×
- Marshall, Angela v. Fed Exprs CorpD.C. Circuit· 1997-12-12· cited 176×
- Debora D. Gordon v. National Youth Work AllianceD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-02· cited 145×
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-04· cited 123×
- Daka, Inc. v. BreinerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-04-30· cited 89×
- Raymond Porter v. United States Alumoweld Company, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 1997-09-15· cited 84×
- Swanks v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityD.C. Circuit· 1999-06-18· cited 59×
Other cases named Blackwell v. Sectek, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.