· 8/8/2012
Gurara v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 881 F. Supp. 2d 143
- 2012 WL 3198346
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110947
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It goes without saying that” insubordination, malfeasance, and the use of abusive or offensive language “are a legitimate basis for disciplinary action.”
- “The complaint also names the District of Columbia’s Department of Transportation, which is non sui juris and may not be sued.”
- “Absenteeism is, without doubt, a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for taking action against an employee.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.