Skip to main content
· 8/8/2012

Gurara v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 881 F. Supp. 2d 143
  • 2012 WL 3198346
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It goes without saying that” insubordination, malfeasance, and the use of abusive or offensive language “are a legitimate basis for disciplinary action.”
  • “The complaint also names the District of Columbia’s Department of Transportation, which is non sui juris and may not be sued.”
  • “Absenteeism is, without doubt, a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for taking action against an employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.