Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where direct evidence of an employer’s retaliatory intent is absent, district courts must scrutinize the available evidence for circumstantial proof
• holding that where direct evidence of an employer’s retaliatory intent is absent, district courts must scrutinize the available evidence for circumstantial proof
• holding that where direct evidence of an employer’s retaliatory intent is absent, district courts must scrutinize the available evidence for circumstantial proof
• holding that where direct evidence of an employer’s retaliatory intent is absent, district courts must scrutinize the available evidence for circumstantial proof
• explaining that court must be cautious about using this \drastic provisional remedy\ where \intent is at issue\
• stating that \courts must be careful not to second-guess an employer's business judgment\ in firing employee; singular inquiry is whether termination was discriminatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).