Skip to main content

Webb v. State

Citations

  • 36 S.W.3d 164
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 8544
  • 2000 WL 1877771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that extraneous-offense evidence must be a A fact of consequence @
  • reasoning that an extraneous offense must be relevant to a “fact of consequence” in the case
  • “[W]e consider the information the appellant claims this witness would have provided to determine if the appellant was prejudiced as a result of the delay.”
  • “valid reasons for the delay” included issues arising from appellant’s inability to get along with appointed defense counsel
  • “In determining if the witness was believed to be material to the case, a court can consider whether there is any evidence that the defendant attempted to obtain the witness’s statement during the 12 delay.”
  • referring to striking similarities between charged offense and extraneous offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edelman, Frost, Hudson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

179 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.