Skip to main content
· 3/30/2006

Plouff v. State

Citations

  • 192 S.W.3d 213
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2546
  • 2006 WL 1148124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a police officer may generally offer lay opinion testimony to prove a defendant’s intoxication
  • stating that the technique is applied properly when the officer follows the standardized procedures outlined in the manual
  • explaining that slight variations in administration of nystagmus test do not render testimony regarding results unreliable or inadmissible but may affect weight to be given to testimony
  • explaining that slight variations in administration of nystagmus test do not render testimony regarding results unreliable or inadmissible but may affect weight to be given to testimony
  • coordination, balance, and mental agility problems exhibited during field sobriety tests are observations grounded in common knowledge
  • “Slight variations in the administration of the HGN test do not render the evidence inadmissible or unreliable, but may affect the weight to be given the testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kem Thompson Frost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.