Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/22/1992

Harris v. State

Citations

827 S.W.2d 949
1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 106
1992 WL 79216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that courts generally hold that any delay of eight months or longer is presumptively unreasonable and triggers speedy trial analysis
recognizing that courts generally hold that any delay of eight months or longer is presumptively unreasonable and triggers speedy trial analysis
recognizing that courts generally hold that any delay of eight months or longer is presumptively unreasonable and triggers speedy trial analysis
recognizing that courts have held delay of eight months is presumptively unreasonable and triggers speedy trial analysis
holding that appellant’s lack of a timely demand for a speedy trial indicates strongly that he did not really want a speedy trial
recognizing that courts generally hold that any delay of eight months or longer is presumptively unreasonable and triggers speedy trial analysis.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

446 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.