Skip to main content

Osbourn v. State

Citations

  • 59 S.W.3d 809
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 6952
  • 2001 WL 1240781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating defendant had notice that State may use police officer as expert because he was arresting officer who completed offense report that was available to defendant and because he was an “ essential witness under any circumstances ” (emphasis added)
  • stating defendant had notice that State may use police officer as expert because he was arresting officer who completed offense report that was available to defendant and because he was an \ essential witness under any circumstances \ (emphasis added)
  • “the extreme sanction of exclusion should not be imposed absent wilfulness on the part of the prosecution.”
  • “the extreme sanction of exclusion should not be imposed absent wilfulness on the part of the prosecution.”
  • “the extreme sanction of exclusion should not be imposed absent wilfulness on the part of the prosecution.”
  • evidence should be admitted unless the State acted in bad faith or willfully failed to respond to the trial court’s order under Article 39.14(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kidd, Puryear, Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.