Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/24/1997

Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.

Citations

  • 120 F.3d 1006
  • 1997 WL 411663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in the context of ERISA, releases “must withstand special scrutiny 24 designed to prevent potential employer or fiduciary abuse”
  • remanding for reevaluation of plaintiff’s rights under Plan under § 1132(a)(1)(B)’s right to enforce the Plan terms
  • remanding for reevaluation of plaintiffs’ rights under plan pursuant to § 1132(a)(1)(B)’s right to enforce the plan terms, where plaintiffs “sought a determination that they were entitled to participate in the plan benefits”
  • remanding for reevaluation of plaintiffs’ rights under plan pursuant to § 1132(a)(1)(B)’s right to enforce the plan terms, where plaintiffs “sought a determination that they were entitled to participate in the plan benefits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Fernandez, Fletcher, Hall, Hawkins, Hug, Nelson, Pregerson, Scannlain, Tashima, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.