John Bauer v. Summit Bancorp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding persuasive the fact that the plan consistently excluded certain classes of individuals for benefits
• finding persuasive the fact that the plan consistently excluded certain classes of individuals for benefits
• establishing participant status where the plaintiff is “eligible to receive a benefit under the plan”
• “We are required to enforce the Plan as written unless we find a provision of ERISA that contains a contrary directive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).