Skip to main content
· 7/5/1984

Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company

Citations

  • 685 P.2d 1081
  • 102 Wash. 2d 219
  • 1 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 392
  • 1984 Wash. LEXIS 1769
  • 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that under Washington law employment manuals can give rise to contractual claims
  • noting that specific and conspicuous statements can prevent an employer from being bound by statements in employment manuals
  • noting that specific and conspicuous statements can prevent an employer from being bound by statements in employment manuals
  • reasoning that “an employee and employer can contractually obligate themselves concerning provisions found in an employee policy manual and thereby contractually modify the terminable at will relationship”
  • stating that employers “can specifically state in a conspicuous manner that nothing contained [in a handbook] is intended to be part of the employment relationship and are simply general statements of company policy”
  • recognizing tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.