Meditrust Financial Services Corp. v. Sterling Chemicals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a plan’s determination regarding medical necessity of treatment involved a review of facts rather than an issue of contract interpretation
• labelling a factual dispute about \medical necessity\ as a question of \eligibility determination\
• rejecting the standard-of-review argument that Blue Cross advances here
• review confined to record available to administrator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).