Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of Yakima

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that elements of adhesion contract are considered in the “circumstances” element of the procedural unconscionability inquiry
• noting that elements of adhesion contract are considered in the “circumstances” element of the procedural unconscionability inquiry
• Noting that elements of adhesion contract are considered in the \circumstances\ element of the procedural unconscionability inquiry.
• denying standing to fire district upon finding that the argument raised could be more effectively argued by the other plaintiffs in the case
• denying standing to fire district upon finding that the argument raised could be more effectively argued by the other plaintiffs in the case
• checking box stating “Yes, I would like to renew my Sonics season tickets for 2007-08 and establish my Emerald Club membership.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).